A few weeks ago I received an email from our ward clerk that the meetinghouse library was weeding out all materials that had been deemed "not appropriate" for meetinghouse libraries. The offending items would be on display in the cultural hall for anyone interested in taking possession of any of them. Free books! You don't have to tell me twice.
So let me describe what I found that's no longer "appropriate" for a meetinghouse collection.
Well, we'll start with old paperbacks from the 1970s about the Osmonds. No surprise there.
Then there were a few LDS-themed novels. Okay, whatever.
Then came the good stuff. What really caught my eye were the Sunday School manuals and church history textbooks from the 1950s and doctrinal treatises by Neal A. Maxwell and Mark E. Petersen. I asked myself why these would no longer be "appropriate." All I can figure is that anything that was published in "pre-correlation" days had to go.
Anyway, I brought home a lot of this sort of stuff. Included was An Introduction to the Gospel by Lowell L. Bennion, published in 1955 by the Deseret Sunday School Union Board. I couldn't resist making a comparison between this and the latest edition of Gospel Principles, published by Intellectual Reserve, Inc., which I have been using in my Sunday School classes since day one as an investigator.
A lot of people lately have been talking about the movement toward "uncorrelated" Mormonism. If this is something that interests you, my advice is to talk to your meetinghouse librarian and see what might be available. Unless it's already been purged.
Friday, April 25, 2014
Sunday, April 20, 2014
Easter 2014 - A Conversion Story
Easter may be the one day of the year most appropriate to relate a conversion story. So here is my conversion story.
It is not so much a conversion story, but rather, as Muslims believe that everyone is born a Muslim and may later in life, after having wandered, "revert" to Islam, this is a kind of "reversion" story. Something you often hear from converts to the LDS faith is that when they first heard of the some of the unique doctrines of the Church, something "clicked." Often you will hear a comment such as, "It sounded strangely familiar." And so it begins. Yes, that was my experience also.
And now, because it's Easter, I will share a link. I know many Saints have shared this link recently, so I'm just piling on, but this short video, Because of Him, is incredibly powerful and moving. How can we not love Him, knowing what He has done for each and every one of us?
O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?
It is not so much a conversion story, but rather, as Muslims believe that everyone is born a Muslim and may later in life, after having wandered, "revert" to Islam, this is a kind of "reversion" story. Something you often hear from converts to the LDS faith is that when they first heard of the some of the unique doctrines of the Church, something "clicked." Often you will hear a comment such as, "It sounded strangely familiar." And so it begins. Yes, that was my experience also.
I
was raised in a Roman Catholic home, but religion in my family was a
Sunday-only activity while the rest of the week was taken up by "real
life." After I left home to attend college, I soon drifted away from
Catholicism, but I seriously examined other faiths and often studied
the Bible. I was looking for a path to follow to bring me closer to
God but there were so many different religious institutions and
leaders teaching so many different doctrines that I eventually came
to believe that all faiths were nothing more than the "traditions
of men" and that no one had any real knowledge of God.
In the meantime I
got an education, entered the work force, married, and had a son. I
filled up my spiritual emptiness with alcohol. I still read the
Bible and occasionally went to Mass or visited various Protestant
churches but didn't find whatever it was I was looking for. The
years went by and as I grew older and reflected upon my life and the
lives of most other people I knew, it was clear to me that if there
was a purpose or meaning to life, I had utterly failed to discover
it.
In the summer of
1993, I vacationed on Beaver Island in Lake Michigan. A Mormon
colony had been established there in the 1850s by James Strang, one
of several individuals who had claimed the leadership of the church
after the death of Joseph Smith. I knew nothing about Mormonism but
because of my interest in the Beaver Island colony, I began to read
about the history of the Mormon people and eventually became
acquainted with the doctrines and practices of the LDS church, many
of which I felt greatly attracted to. There was that unsettling feeling of familiarity. But I dismissed the story of
Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon without bothering to learn much
about it.
But my fascination
with Mormonism continued unabated. I admired the Mormon people but
considered myself totally dead to the sort of faith necessary to
actually join any religious group. However, I truly envied anyone
who had what I thought to be a “simple faith” and who found
truth, hope, and meaning within it.
I thought that I
was basically a good person, but I felt a desire to be more
"Christ-like”. I was disappointed and discouraged by how far I
fell short of this ideal. I wanted to be the kind of person Jesus
was, at least in my imagination. But I wasn't very enthusiastic
about trying to be more caring, generous, and humble. That was hard.
And I when I tried, I failed again and again.
What was missing
in my life was a true understanding of Jesus Christ -- not as a mere
figure from the remote past who was exceptionally wise and brave and
loving, but as a divine being who suffered, died, and rose from the
dead, and who lives now so that I -- and all the people of the earth
-- may put our complete trust and faith in Him and overcome our
limitations and weaknesses and indeed become like Him.
My wife and I
lived for many years in a house across the street from an
apartment complex where the the LDS missionaries lived. I would see them
walking around town now and then, and I promised myself that if they
ever knocked on my door, I would sit down and have a talk with them.
They came a few times, but I was never at home.
One day, after I
got home from work, my wife said, "The missionaries were here.
At first I thought they were Jehovah's Witnesses and I was going to
send them away, but then I realized they were Mormons. I told them
about all the books you have about Mormonism and they got really
excited. So I told them to come back tomorrow evening."
Well, I wanted to
stay true to the promise I had made myself, so I made sure I was home
the next evening when they arrived. I was expecting the usual pair
of elders that I'd always seen walking around the neighborhood, but behold, there were three of them -- and they were sister missionaries!
I sat down with the sisters and we talked about faith. All along I had been expecting
"faith" to just happen to me. The sisters taught me that
faith is a decision that I must make every day. It can be nurtured
and grown but this requires daily attention and effort. I read Alma
32 and my mind was enlightened. The sisters asked me to come to
church, so I did.
These sister
missionaries were examples to me of how to live a Christ-like life.
They were simply amazing people -- so full of charity and the love of
Christ, and totally devoted to proclaiming the Gospel. Later, when I
related how my interest in Mormonism began with a vacation to a
remote island in Lake Michigan in 1993, it was pointed out to me that
all three of these sister missionaries had been born in 1993. I
experienced many meaningful "coincidences" like that --
once noticed, they can't be ignored – and this encouraged me and
gave me confidence that I was making the right decision in joining
the Church.
In all my years of reading about the history and doctrines of the Restoration, I had never actually read the Book of Mormon. Now, I read the Book
of Mormon attentively, guided by the missionaries. I was soon convinced that Joseph Smith couldn't
have written it himself; and all the theories about other people
writing it, or that it was plagiarized from existing manuscripts,
seemed to me to be obvious hogwash. I now believe that regardless of
the precise details of how the Book of Mormon was produced, it came
to us through Joseph Smith from a divine realm.
I was praying to
get a spiritual witness or testimony about the truth of the Book of
Mormon, but it wasn't coming. This did not discourage me, however.
I had a love for the doctrines of the Restoration and a love for my
brothers and sisters in Christ. I watched the October 2013 General
Conference, and Sister Oscarson, the Young Women's President,
gave a talk about conversion, in which she stated that true
conversion occurs over a long period of time, as we act upon the
doctrines of the gospel and put them into daily practice. For me, it was the right message at the right time.
As my baptismal
date approached, I was still concerned that I didn’t have an
adequate testimony, so I asked Heavenly Father very directly and
insistently to provide me with some direction. That night I dreamed
that I gave a priesthood blessing to one of my co-workers. And so, even though my testimony was not what I imagined it should be, my
hesitation about entering into my baptismal covenants vanished. His sheep know His voice.
O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?
Friday, April 18, 2014
Hey! You're Not Supposed to be Drinking That!
Exactly how one interprets the Word of Wisdom when it comes to what one drinks is an interesting topic of conversation. I'm amused that when non-members learn that I've recently joined the LDS church, they often tell me what I can and can't drink. I'm surprised by how prevalent the belief is that "Mormons can't have any caffeine." Non-members have observed me drinking Coke Zero at my workplace and have helpfully volunteered the information that Mormons aren't supposed to do this.
Members of the church know exactly what to do in this situation. That's right: Share the gospel! Or at least explain a little bit about the Word of Wisdom and the intent behind it. The fact that it's not all black-and-white, and that there is space for individual judgment -- in other words, there is a "spirit" behind the "letter" of the law -- is a good thing for people to know.
Of course, there are varying cultural norms within Mormondom, and I'm very aware that Utah, being an entirely different planet, has an entirely different way of looking at certain things than those of us out here in the "mission field." Thus, the joke, "What's the difference between a good Mormon and a bad Mormon? The temperature of their caffeine!"
I love the description of the Word of Wisdom as given "not by commandment or constraint", but as "a principle with promise." The promise is that as we obey the commandments of God, we will enjoy improved health, both spiritually and physically. We will become whole.
The best advice I've received about how to approach the caffeine conundrum is the simple "take it or leave it" test. Is it really a big deal for me if I don't drink a can of Coke today? Will it disturb my spiritual equilibrium if I do drink a can of Coke today? If I can answer "yes" to either of those questions, then I need to re-evaluate how I'm interpreting the Word of Wisdom. Maybe I should add Coke to the no-no list.
Members of the church know exactly what to do in this situation. That's right: Share the gospel! Or at least explain a little bit about the Word of Wisdom and the intent behind it. The fact that it's not all black-and-white, and that there is space for individual judgment -- in other words, there is a "spirit" behind the "letter" of the law -- is a good thing for people to know.
Of course, there are varying cultural norms within Mormondom, and I'm very aware that Utah, being an entirely different planet, has an entirely different way of looking at certain things than those of us out here in the "mission field." Thus, the joke, "What's the difference between a good Mormon and a bad Mormon? The temperature of their caffeine!"
I love the description of the Word of Wisdom as given "not by commandment or constraint", but as "a principle with promise." The promise is that as we obey the commandments of God, we will enjoy improved health, both spiritually and physically. We will become whole.
The best advice I've received about how to approach the caffeine conundrum is the simple "take it or leave it" test. Is it really a big deal for me if I don't drink a can of Coke today? Will it disturb my spiritual equilibrium if I do drink a can of Coke today? If I can answer "yes" to either of those questions, then I need to re-evaluate how I'm interpreting the Word of Wisdom. Maybe I should add Coke to the no-no list.
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
What's the Deal with the Sacrament Prayers?
I recently performed my first actual "priestly" function as a recently-ordained member of the Aaronic Priesthood. The EQP from the branch I originally attended before later moving into a new ward and then being baptized, invited me to visit the branch for sacrament meeting this past Sunday and perform the blessing over the bread. I was grateful for the opportunity to do so and readily accepted his invitation.
All went well, and I didn't flub the words and have to repeat the prayer. Still, I wonder why the sacrament prayers are so often difficult to recite accurately, even when being read from a card? There IS something about the diction that's rather clunky, and we're generally not used to verbalizing sentences with so many subordinate clauses. But it just shouldn't be that big a deal to get through it error-free.
A missionary told me that someone actually went inactive for awhile after messing up the sacrament prayer because he was so embarrassed. I guess that's one advantage of being an older dude in this situation -- I've done so many embarrassing things in my life, having to re-do the sacrament prayer doesn't even warrant a tournament bid.
All went well, and I didn't flub the words and have to repeat the prayer. Still, I wonder why the sacrament prayers are so often difficult to recite accurately, even when being read from a card? There IS something about the diction that's rather clunky, and we're generally not used to verbalizing sentences with so many subordinate clauses. But it just shouldn't be that big a deal to get through it error-free.
A missionary told me that someone actually went inactive for awhile after messing up the sacrament prayer because he was so embarrassed. I guess that's one advantage of being an older dude in this situation -- I've done so many embarrassing things in my life, having to re-do the sacrament prayer doesn't even warrant a tournament bid.
Friday, April 11, 2014
It's Official -- "I'm a Mormon"!
I am now officially a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints! Check out how I have mastered the proper hyphenation and capitalization of the official name of my Church. Behold, it beginneth to be delicious to me.
So I decided to fire up this blog. Years ago, before I became a member of the Church, I started up a Mormon-themed blog as an outlet for my fascination with all things LDS. Suffice it to say that now, as a member, I have plenty of outlets. I have home teaching assignments, a calling, family history research to do, the whole ball of wax!
Frankly, I feel like I have a pretty lame testimony. My most common responses when non-members ask me why I joined the Church are:
1. I reached a point in my life when I felt that it was better to be a member than to not be a member.
2. The flood is coming and it's time to get on the ark.
3. I want to be good -- not just good, but someone who has a sincere desire to be good and no desire at all to be evil -- and Mormons seem like the best people to hang with to help me move in this direction.
4. I'm not sure.
I have to tell you, dear readers, that it was not the Book of Mormon that got me into the Church. I truly love the Book of Mormon, but it's a peculiar love, sort of like the love that people develop for especially quirky or weird friends and relatives. You don't necessarily want to live under the same roof with them, but whenever you do see them, it's like experiencing a breath of fresh air, a tasty snack, and a few laughs all at once.
The fact is that the Book of Mormon was not always the Big Enchilada of missionary work the way it has been for the past thirty years or so. If President Benson is to be believed, and why wouldn't he be, we Mormons have only until very recently paid very much attention at all to the Book of Mormon. This neglect, it seems, goes all the way back to the earliest days of the Church.
I asked Sister Kane, a very witty and brilliant missionary, how many of her investigators actually ever read the Book of Mormon all the way through. Her immediate answer was, "The ones who got baptized."
And I believe this. However, when you really get to know the Book of Mormon, there are a few things you come to realize about it that can be surprising, amusing, disconcerting, or puzzling, depending on where you are coming from.
First of all is how much of it is filler. Seriously. Like "junk DNA" -- if it serves any purpose at all, we haven't yet figured it out.
Second, is how much of it is unintentionally (or intentionally) funny. For example, objects of "curious workmanship" abound in the the Book of Mormon. And who creates these objects of curious workmanship? Why, curious workmen, of course! And only in the Book of Mormon will you be told that in the umpteenth year of the reign of the judges, well, nothing much at all happened. This is related to the basic principle that when one is short on ore (with which to create more plates), it's important to get as many of these non-eventful years covered in your history as possible.
Third, there's the fact that Jesus is both the Father AND the Son. I'm not going to delve into this at all, it's beyond me. But there it is. I used to think that the Book of Mormon was trinitarian, but no -- it's something else entirely, some theological beast from 20,000 fathoms, a fearsome creature spawned by a mixing together of elements that should never, in the natural course of things, be mixed together.
Fourth, there's Third Nephi, Chapter Eight, in which Jesus goes all Armageddon on the Nephites in a big way. Not exactly a meek-and-mild type guy we have here.
But if one takes the Book of Mormon seriously -- and I do -- then one has to face the challenge of fitting all of this into one's spiritual worldview.
So I'm taking this new blog forward. I'm not sure what I'll be doing with it, but I'll think of something.
So I decided to fire up this blog. Years ago, before I became a member of the Church, I started up a Mormon-themed blog as an outlet for my fascination with all things LDS. Suffice it to say that now, as a member, I have plenty of outlets. I have home teaching assignments, a calling, family history research to do, the whole ball of wax!
Frankly, I feel like I have a pretty lame testimony. My most common responses when non-members ask me why I joined the Church are:
1. I reached a point in my life when I felt that it was better to be a member than to not be a member.
2. The flood is coming and it's time to get on the ark.
3. I want to be good -- not just good, but someone who has a sincere desire to be good and no desire at all to be evil -- and Mormons seem like the best people to hang with to help me move in this direction.
4. I'm not sure.
I have to tell you, dear readers, that it was not the Book of Mormon that got me into the Church. I truly love the Book of Mormon, but it's a peculiar love, sort of like the love that people develop for especially quirky or weird friends and relatives. You don't necessarily want to live under the same roof with them, but whenever you do see them, it's like experiencing a breath of fresh air, a tasty snack, and a few laughs all at once.
The fact is that the Book of Mormon was not always the Big Enchilada of missionary work the way it has been for the past thirty years or so. If President Benson is to be believed, and why wouldn't he be, we Mormons have only until very recently paid very much attention at all to the Book of Mormon. This neglect, it seems, goes all the way back to the earliest days of the Church.
I asked Sister Kane, a very witty and brilliant missionary, how many of her investigators actually ever read the Book of Mormon all the way through. Her immediate answer was, "The ones who got baptized."
And I believe this. However, when you really get to know the Book of Mormon, there are a few things you come to realize about it that can be surprising, amusing, disconcerting, or puzzling, depending on where you are coming from.
First of all is how much of it is filler. Seriously. Like "junk DNA" -- if it serves any purpose at all, we haven't yet figured it out.
Second, is how much of it is unintentionally (or intentionally) funny. For example, objects of "curious workmanship" abound in the the Book of Mormon. And who creates these objects of curious workmanship? Why, curious workmen, of course! And only in the Book of Mormon will you be told that in the umpteenth year of the reign of the judges, well, nothing much at all happened. This is related to the basic principle that when one is short on ore (with which to create more plates), it's important to get as many of these non-eventful years covered in your history as possible.
Third, there's the fact that Jesus is both the Father AND the Son. I'm not going to delve into this at all, it's beyond me. But there it is. I used to think that the Book of Mormon was trinitarian, but no -- it's something else entirely, some theological beast from 20,000 fathoms, a fearsome creature spawned by a mixing together of elements that should never, in the natural course of things, be mixed together.
Fourth, there's Third Nephi, Chapter Eight, in which Jesus goes all Armageddon on the Nephites in a big way. Not exactly a meek-and-mild type guy we have here.
But if one takes the Book of Mormon seriously -- and I do -- then one has to face the challenge of fitting all of this into one's spiritual worldview.
So I'm taking this new blog forward. I'm not sure what I'll be doing with it, but I'll think of something.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)